More Workers Quit Than Were Laid Off In March

by Stephen Xavier on May 13, 2010

In the Wall Street Journal they reported that more U.S. workers quit their jobs than were laid off in March, the second month in a row this occurred and a sign of employees’ growing confidence that more positions are becoming available in a slowly recovering job market.

Although I truly trust the Journal as a trusted news source, in my experience as an Executive Coach working in a wide range of Fortune 500 companies I couldn’t disagree more strongly with the Journal’s reporting. Over the last 18 months other data has been released from a variety of sources reporting that worker dissatisfaction has risen sharply and the highest in decades. What if this exodus of the workforce is due less to worker “confidence” and more to do with the issues I see in large organizations every day:

Workers who are afraid of their own future as they see co-workers laid off – in some cases – by the thousands

These same workers who remain on the job being “coached” to do “more with less” i.e., do their jobs, their former co-workers job and in many cases, the jobs of subordinates who were also laid off

And finally, the combined stresses of issues # 1 & 2 being simply too much to bear.

During a recent cross-country flight I had the good fortune of sitting in FIrst Class and seated next to an executive of a large, global company in the Agri business who vented about the aforementioned issues and ended by saying both she and her Peers at work now have one big question they face every day; “What work, task or project do I KNOW I can’t finish today …?” That is the reality of today’s tough economic times and the lay-offs and other resource cut-backs occurring in US businesses.

The Journal went on to say that nearly 1.9 million employees quit in March compared with more than 1.8 million who were laid-off or discharged, the Labor Department said Tuesday. February, they went on to say, marked the first month since November 2008 when the number who quit was larger than the number who were laid off or discharged.

“The most positive thing, certainly, is hiring activity finally started to pick up,” said Harm Bandholz, a UniCredit Research economist. But “companies are still very cautious.” Cautious is an understatement. In late-2009 a survey of The CEO Roundtable, a group of CEO’s representing some of America’s largest and most successful companies, revealed that 40% of them saw things getting worse, not better, in 2010 and that same 40% saw more lay-offs coming, not growth, as the White House keeps telling us.

The Labor Department noted that, “The quits rate can serve as a measure of workers’ willingness or ability to change jobs.” I disagree. Recent numbers around those who are unemployed who simply quit looking for a job jumped. Further, there are hundreds of thousand of “the uncounted” who run small businesses that have lost their businesses but would never show up in any Labor Department statistics.  And let’s not forget that those who are either ineligible to collect unemployment or, those who’s benefits simply run out are also not counted.

Both figures—the number who quit and those who were laid off—rose slightly in March, compared with the prior month, but quits have been outpacing those who were discharged in recent months largely because the pace of layoffs has slowed from its peak during the recession, the article went on to say.

On a positive note, perhaps, the number of hires was also larger than the number of total separations, which include quits, layoffs and retirements. Separations increased 1.2% to 4 million in March from February.

Jobs still aren’t easy to find. There were just 2.7 million job openings in March and 5.6 unemployed persons per available job as employers have shied away from widespread hiring.

Small businesses have been particularly reluctant to add to their ranks. An index of small-business optimism rose 3.8 points to 90.6 in April, the National Federation of Independent Business said Tuesday. Despite the improvement, owners surveyed said that, on net, they shed more workers than they added for the 27th consecutive month.

Perhaps the government numbers need a bit of a scrubbing, further inclusion of the uncounted and, perhaps some version of an “exit interview” that goes beyond speculation as to why more workers quit rather than look only at numbers. Doing so may shed some real light on what is afoot here.

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit

{ 1 comment }

Below is a blog post from Michelle Malkin that I just could not resist publishing. 100% editorial credit goes to her. Please read:

How Mexico Treats Illegal Aliens
Michelle Malkin
Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Mexican President Felipe Calderon has accused Arizona of opening the door “to intolerance, hate, discrimination and abuse in law enforcement.” But Arizona has nothing on Mexico when it comes to cracking down on illegal aliens. While open-borders activists decry new enforcement measures signed into law in “Nazi-zona” last week, they remain deaf, dumb or willfully blind to the unapologetically restrictionist policies of our neighbors to the south.

The Arizona law bans sanctuary cities that refuse to enforce immigration laws, stiffens penalties against illegal alien day laborers and their employers, makes it a misdemeanor for immigrants to fail to complete and carry an alien registration document, and allows the police to arrest immigrants unable to show documents proving they are in the U.S. legally. If those rules constitute the racist, fascist, xenophobic, inhumane regime that the National Council of La Raza, Al Sharpton, Catholic bishops and their grievance-mongering followers claim, then what about these regulations and restrictions imposed on foreigners?

– The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” How’s that for racial and ethnic profiling?

– If outsiders do not enhance the country’s “economic or national interests” or are “not found to be physically or mentally healthy,” they are not welcome. Neither are those who show “contempt against national sovereignty or security.” They must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam and prove they can provide their own health care.

– Illegal entry into the country is equivalent to a felony punishable by two years’ imprisonment. Document fraud is subject to fine and imprisonment; so is alien marriage fraud. Evading deportation is a serious crime; illegal re-entry after deportation is punishable by ten years’ imprisonment. Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country (see, for example, President Obama’s illegal alien aunt — a fugitive from deportation for eight years who is awaiting a second decision on her previously rejected asylum claim).

– Law enforcement officials at all levels — by national mandate — must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The Mexican military is also required to assist in immigration enforcement operations. Native-born Mexicans are empowered to make citizens’ arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.

– Ready to show your papers? Mexico’s National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens’ identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico’s Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There’s been no public clamor for “comprehensive immigration reform” in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited.

Consider: Open-borders protesters marched freely at the Capitol building in Arizona, comparing GOP Gov. Jan Brewer to Hitler, waving Mexican flags, advocating that demonstrators “Smash the State,” and holding signs that proclaimed “No human is illegal” and “We have rights.”

But under the Mexican constitution, such political speech by foreigners is banned. Noncitizens cannot “in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.” In fact, a plethora of Mexican statutes enacted by its congress limit the participation of foreign nationals and companies in everything from investment, education, mining and civil aviation to electric energy and firearms. Foreigners have severely limited private property and employment rights (if any).

As for abuse, the Mexican government is notorious for its abuse of Central American illegal aliens who attempt to violate Mexico’s southern border. The Red Cross has protested rampant Mexican police corruption, intimidation and bribery schemes targeting illegal aliens there for years. Mexico didn’t respond by granting mass amnesty to illegal aliens, as it is demanding that we do. It clamped down on its borders even further. In late 2008, the Mexican government launched an aggressive deportation plan to curtain illegal Cuban immigration and human trafficking through Cancun.

Meanwhile, Mexican consular offices in the United States have coordinated with left-wing social justice groups and the Catholic Church leadership to demand a moratorium on all deportations and a freeze on all employment raids across America.

Mexico is doing the job Arizona is now doing — a job the U.S. government has failed miserably to do: putting its people first. Here’s the proper rejoinder to all the hysterical demagogues in Mexico (and their sympathizers here on American soil) now calling for boycotts and invoking Jim Crow laws, apartheid and the Holocaust because Arizona has taken its sovereignty into its own hands:

Hipócritas.

Copyright © 2010 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit

{ 0 comments }

FedEx vs. UPS vs a Truly Free Market

by Stephen Xavier on April 20, 2010

Following the above title should be the subtitle “Why Business and Politics Don’t Mix” – One need not look much further than any recent daily paper to find articles entitles “FedEx, Teamsters Battle on Bill” to get a flavor of what is brewing in Washington; dangerous legislation funded by Unions, blessed by the WHite House and a jobs-killer.

In case you missed it I am referring to current legislation aimed to give Unions the right to more easily unionize within the airline industry, something they are hindered from doing and with good reason. And the AFL-CIO, the primary funding source for getting Obama in office, is making this bill a “top priority”.

Although in this current round it is the Democrats, headed by James Oberstar (D.Minn) either party can be found “guilty”. In this round nine of the top 11 campaign contributors to Oberstar’s campaign are labor unions and needless to say, they are on a mission to get this bill passed. Proponents and big donors include the Teamsters, Airline Pilots Association and the Machinists/Aerospace Workers Unions who collectively, gave upwards of $725,000 to date to Oberstar’s campaign. If the bill passes it will ease unions into a “strategic space” to potentially increase membership at companies like FedEx and even in overseas locations while trying to recapture maintenance work that has drifted there as a means to save sky-rocketing costs.

But let’s face it, although this round belongs to the Democrats should we as Americans continue to tolerate any US corporation donating hundreds of thousand of dollars to influence any elected official? The answer should be a resounding “No!” It’s time for our Congress to step up and do the right thing and create true campaign reform that limits corporate donors to “zero” and allows the American people to fund campaigns, with limits, to stop this game of “whoever has the biggest stick wins” – enough is enough.

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit

{ 0 comments }

American Leadership

by Stephen Xavier on April 17, 2010

Have you noticed a decline in the quality of leadership in America?

I don’t care if it’s in business or in government. It’s getting worse, much worse. One would think that in the worst of times – like right now! –  that people would be motivated to improve but instead, leadership is on the wane when it is, ironically, most needed.

Courageous leadership? Not a chance! I wonder what would happen if leaders would actually step up, demonstrate courage and actually lead with vision where we would be right now; where we at least might be heading in our near-future.

What do you think? Is it just me? Or, is this problem reaching near-empidemic levels all around us?

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit

{ 0 comments }

CBS Reality Show Undercover Boss Sends a Wake-up Call to America’s CEOs

April 7, 2010

In this current economic down-turn there have been two distinctly different, diametrically opposed leadership trends that have surfaced in American companies; leadership that has gone underground and leadership that has surfaced in full-force and full-engagement with its workforce. There is nothing like a hit reality show to inspire water cooler exchanges and surface both trends [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →

Ford’s Mulally Tops Executive Coach Stephen Xavier’s “America’s Best CEOs” List

March 18, 2010

Ford’s Mulally Tops Executive Coach Stephen Xavier’s Roundup of America’s Best CEOs
America’s Top Coach, Stephen Xavier - Ford Motor Company recently stunned industry experts by surpassing General Motors in overall sales for the first time in more than 50 years. Executive coach Stephen Xavier credits this accomplishment to the strategic leadership of Ford CEO Alan Mulally, [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →

Toyota, Mr. Toyoda and His Cultural Faux Pas

February 26, 2010

One need not look very far to see countless images of Toyota’s Chief bowing apologetically and repeating, without pause, his apologies to Congress and the American people for the faults of Toyota and it’s mis-steps regarding the safety issues that have blanketed the airwaves these days.
Do the American people really buy it? Never  mind the [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →

Dealing With Post-Promotion Separation

February 22, 2010

I should be celebrating the fact that I’ve recently been promoted—but I feel completely alienated.  I was promoted to the director of a group I was a part of. I have heard the expression that it is lonely at the top—but I feel as if I’ve lost my entire social support network.  Any hope for [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →

The Dark Side of the Retirement Bubble

February 9, 2010

Is another perfect storm looming on the economic horizon once we sort through the current financial crisis?
Key industries have not addressed the loss of critical knowledge that will hit them when a huge number of baby boomers head for retirement by 2010. In fact, although the retirement crisis is already well underway, our current economic crisis has bought [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →

Creating Successful Successions

February 8, 2010

The following is an excerpt from my article, What Happens When CEOs Leave?, published in the Winter 2009 issue of M World, a publication of the American Management Association.
The baby boomer retirement crisis, which is no longer just looming but well under way, makes CEO departures an increasing reality—a reality that apparently has yet to sink [...]

Share This:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Reddit
Read the full article →